![]() We thank both Ranallo and Randazza for their contribution. The other post in this series, which argues the opposite of Randazza, can be found here. He has been respectful to us, and we ask that readers treat him as our guest and take the opportunity for debate. We understand that our readers may not agree with Randazza either, but we ask that comments remain civil and respectful. His piece focuses mainly on the question of whether people who operate open WiFi networks are liable for the copyright infringements of others.Īs much as we may disagree with his cases in this field, Randazza has always been gracious with his time when we have had questions about his and other cases. The opinion below comes from Marc Randazza, a lawyer who has sued thousands of BitTorrent users in recent months on behalf of copyright holders. Today we publish two opinion pieces from copyright lawyers who are familiar with the mass-lawsuits against alleged BitTorrent users in the U.S.īoth lawyers discuss whether someone can be held liable for the copyright infringements committed by others on their Internet connection. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |